Credit Unions Offer Themselves as Partial Solution to Looming Student Loan Crisis

In the last six months alone, since legislators eliminated over $21 billion in subsidies to student loan lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program, at least 44 FFELP lenders have stopped originating federal student loans.

This exodus of lenders from the federal student loan program, combined with the current credit and liquidity crunch resulting from an epidemic of defaulted mortgages, may leave many college students scrambling for money for school this fall.

In an effort to help avoid a student loan crisis before it starts, a group of credit unions serving students in California, Texas, and Wisconsin is lobbying for federal subsidies that would allow credit unions to provide significantly more loan capital for students.

Last September, federal legislation set two lender subsidy rates on federally guaranteed student loans, one rate that applies to for-profit lenders and a second for state-chartered nonprofit agencies, explains Paul Basken of The Chronicle of Higher Education.

When those rates were set, credit unions, which are essentially nonprofit banks, were left out of the picture, neither subject to the for-profit lender rate nor eligible for the nonprofit rate which is guaranteed only to state-chartered lenders.

Now, writes Basken, as more for-profit bank and nonbank lenders abandon the FFEL program each week, the credit unions seek legislation that would make them eligible for the nonprofit subsidy rate (“Credit Unions Will Lobby Congress for Loan-Subsidy Benefits Accorded to Nonprofit Lenders,” April 4, 2008).


A Viable Source for More Student Loans?

Credit unions currently provide less than 1 percent of all FFELP loans, according to Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org, a financial aid website.

However, credit unions could offer significantly more volume at some institutions, Michael K. Kim, vice president for student services at the USC Credit Union, told The Chronicle.

The USC Credit Union provided 30 percent of all federal student loans at the University of Southern California last year, and Kim believes the USC Credit Union could double its student loan lending to $200 million to provide financing for any students unable to find another lender.

Although Kim thinks the credit union might find a way to double its student loans even without the nonprofit subsidy, the nonprofit rate would help.

One of the key selling points in the credit unions’ lobbying efforts, Basken writes, may be the fact that credit unions have a ready pool of capital — their customer deposits — from which to lend. In contrast, nonbank lenders, who don’t hold funding capital, must find external funding sources for their student loans and thus have been more vulnerable to the liquidity crisis that’s followed the fallout in mortgage lending.

Joining Kim’s Southern California credit-union group in lobbying Congress next week for the nonprofit subsidy rate are the UW Credit Union, serving universities in Wisconsin, and the University Federal Credit Union, which serves more than 100 colleges and employers in central Texas.


More, but Still Not Enough

An advisor from Senator Edward Kennedy’s office recently expressed support for the credit unions’ request that their proposal for inclusion in the nonprofit subsidy rate be added to the legislation for reauthorization of the Higher Education Act currently before Congress.

Kantrowitz believes that the credit unions’ subsidy proposal is reasonable since they’re nonprofit entities whose earnings don’t benefit outside investors.

On the other hand, he says, the additional loan volume credit unions could provide for the federally backed student loan program will likely not be enough to staunch the tide of students that may potentially be unable to find lenders this fall.

Kantrowitz further points out that among the 100 largest lenders in the federal student loan program, only three are credit unions.

“If credit unions can double their volume, that’s a 5-percent solution,” Kantrowitz says. “It could be part of the solution, but not even close to the entire solution.”